What You Receive
Every package delivers practical, application-focused analysis designed to improve the actual form — not generic advice. EVAL+ is an independent service, not an official National Agency assessment or a guarantee of funding.
Evaluator-Style Score
An estimated score by award criterion, plus an overall funding-readiness view.
Criterion Diagnosis
Strengths, weaknesses, inconsistencies and evidence gaps mapped to the criteria.
EVAL Recommendations
Clear, actionable fixes for every identified point-loss risk.
Revision Roadmap
A prioritised sequence showing what to improve first and why.
One Re-evaluation
A second review after revision is included in every package.
Professional PDF Report
Structured feedback you can use directly while strengthening the form.
What Is EVAL+?
EVAL+ is an independent pre-submission evaluation and application-strengthening system for Erasmus+ KA122, KA210 and KA220 proposals. It assesses your draft through an evaluator’s lens, identifies where points may be lost and converts every weakness into a concrete EVAL Recommendation before submission.
Choose Your EVAL+
One clear fixed price for a complete pre-submission evaluation, practical EVAL Recommendations and one re-evaluation after revision.
KA122
€49
Evaluator-style score estimate, criterion-based risk diagnosis, practical EVAL Recommendations and one re-evaluation.
KA210
€69
Partnership and project-design review, score estimate, revision roadmap, practical EVAL Recommendations and one re-evaluation.
KA220
€119
Strategic review of work packages, partnership, impact and funding readiness, practical EVAL Recommendations and one re-evaluation.
How EVAL+ Works
EVAL+ turns pre-submission assessment into a focused improvement cycle: Evaluate, Strengthen and Re-evaluate.
1. Evaluate
Your draft is assessed against action-specific award criteria to identify weak evidence, broken logic chains, inconsistencies and funding risks.
2. Strengthen
Each finding becomes a practical EVAL Recommendation showing what to change, where to change it and which evidence should support the revised answer.
3. Re-evaluate
After revision, the application is reviewed again to confirm that the weaknesses were genuinely corrected and the proposal is ready to compete.